Subject:
|
Question about 7128?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Fri, 11 Jun 1999 16:13:00 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
539 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
i don't know if this has already been discussed but is there any reason why
7128 speeder bikes break from TLG set number sequence.
all the classic sets, except this one, has a logical progression: 7110, 7130,
7140, 7150.
if you look at the episode 1 line up for example it seems to be pretty much
complete:
7101, 7111, 7121, 7131, 7141, 7151, 7161, 7171
maybe there was a set numbered 7120 that fell behind on the drawing board so
they had to release this first. . .
but why is the set number such a big break from the rest of the pack. makes me
wonder if there are 7118, 7138, 7148, etc. and more sets in between!
hmmm, maybe there are bigger and better sets waiting for us down the road.
a new hope,
sun
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: ![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: Question about 7128?
|
| (...) me (...) If I had to speculate and go way out on a limb (and a wishing star), I'd say that it was given that number to designate it as a ROTJ set. Since ROTJ saw the introduction of many new vehicles (skiffs, a-wings, b-wings, tie (...) (26 years ago, 14-Jun-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
4 Messages in This Thread: ![You are here](/news/here.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Question about 7128? -Brent Curtis (14-Jun-99 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Question about 7128? -Eric Kingsley (15-Jun-99 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Question about 7128? -Jeff Stembel (15-Jun-99 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|