 | | Random Jar Jar thought (non-spoiler, reviewish) —Eric Joslin
|
| | | Jar Jar moves around too much. He's always figiting. He never stands still. I know the temptation is to make CGI characters move around a bit, because heck, they're animated. But it begins to look odd when he's standing with a bunch of human actors (...) (26 years ago, 20-May-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Random Jar Jar thought (non-spoiler, reviewish) —Ben Pegler
|
| | | | | (...) Yeah I noticed that too - in the trailer even - it kinda got on my wick and I thought the same things. Now I'm not bagging anything Starwars - just constructive criticism don't you know! (...) if (...) ...and perhaps a deep-fried Ewok or two (...) (26 years ago, 20-May-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Random Jar Jar thought (non-spoiler, reviewish) —Eric Kingsley
|
| | | | | (...) I would have to agree with Jar Jar being a bit anoying although I did like the Gungan's overall. That was only a minor drawback for me and still give it a big "Thumb's Up". I would rate it better than ROTJ but not quite as good as ESB or ANH. (...) (26 years ago, 20-May-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Random Jar Jar thought (non-spoiler, reviewish) —John VanZwieten
|
| | | | Lorbaat <eric@nospam.thirteen.net> wrote in message news:FC0vJ1.AHK@lugnet.com... (...) This is what has always irritated me about CGI. Nothing stands still enough to really get a good look at it. It may be that if they remain still, the illusion (...) (26 years ago, 20-May-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Random Jar Jar thought (non-spoiler, reviewish) —James Brown
|
| | | | (...) still. (...) to (...) That's one of the things I've always admired about Reboot (and other Mainframe productions) - the characters look like real people, and will just stand if that's all they're doing. Admittedly, Reboot is a different type (...) (26 years ago, 20-May-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
