To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.starwarsOpen lugnet.starwars in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Star Wars / 17248
  Re: Thats no moon!!!
 
(...) Star?! Thanks for all the photos Lar. (19 years ago, 20-Feb-05, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: Thats no moon!!!
 
(...) The second Death Star wasn't damaged - it was "unfinished" (but still fully operational). Buy two? Nah, buy three - build both the "finished" Death Star I and the "unfinished" Death Star II. Don't forget to swarm both with lots of mini-mini (...) (19 years ago, 23-Feb-05, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: Thats no moon!!!
 
(...) Let's disregard that the actual size differential is about 11x (according to some sources) and go with a more realistic upsize of 5x in length, width, and height. That would give a convincingly "wow, that's bigger" model, and stick with the (...) (19 years ago, 23-Feb-05, to lugnet.starwars, FTX)

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR