 | | Re: Thats no moon!!!
|
| (...) (URL) (20 years ago, 20-Feb-05, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Re: Thats no moon!!!
|
| (...) That ARC-170 Starfighter looks wicked! KDJ ___...___ LUGNETer #203 (20 years ago, 20-Feb-05, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Re: Thats no moon!!!
|
| (...) Star?! Thanks for all the photos Lar. (20 years ago, 20-Feb-05, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Re: Thats no moon!!!
|
| (...) The second Death Star wasn't damaged - it was "unfinished" (but still fully operational). Buy two? Nah, buy three - build both the "finished" Death Star I and the "unfinished" Death Star II. Don't forget to swarm both with lots of mini-mini (...) (20 years ago, 23-Feb-05, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Re: Thats no moon!!!
|
| (...) Let's disregard that the actual size differential is about 11x (according to some sources) and go with a more realistic upsize of 5x in length, width, and height. That would give a convincingly "wow, that's bigger" model, and stick with the (...) (20 years ago, 23-Feb-05, to lugnet.starwars, FTX)
| |
