 | | Re: My impressions of the Imperial Star Destroyer Model ( some "spoilers")
|
|
(...) snip I think I will consider the sorting of the pieces as well. Normally I work with a big pile of pieces. Although with that many pieces I could get burried! Cheers Felix (22 years ago, 31-Dec-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Lando and Mace
|
|
As I sit here slightly addled from the evening's festivities (check the date and hour), I have to wonder how this bit of news is not THEE item of hot discussion. I can't believe that TLC finally conceded that mini-yellow is/was not meant to (...) (22 years ago, 1-Jan-03, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO AT-AT and Hailfire Droid (Smaller links)
|
|
(...) I think that would be totally in order. We need to see some snowtroops besides in an AT-AT. It would be really cruel of Lego to make them available only through a very large set. I would also like them to make a rebel Taun-Taun with rider and (...) (22 years ago, 1-Jan-03, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: What's the big deal about the Mini TIE?
|
|
(...) Hehe, I remember seeing that. I thought "Wow, what a lame set!" But still, business is business. Kind of sneaky, yet funny. ~Evan Butzlaff (22 years ago, 1-Jan-03, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Review of 10030 Imperial Star Destroyer
|
|
(...) The only things on the ship that aren't perfectly mirrored are the detail 10x1 plates around the large trench, and the 10x2 detail plates on the tower. And those are only assymmetrical because they themselves are mirror images from the left to (...) (22 years ago, 31-Dec-02, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.starwars)
|
