Subject:
|
Re: Could TLG Answer our prayers?...A Millenium Falcon
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Wed, 21 Apr 1999 03:57:40 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2243 times
|
| |
|
|
Tom McDonald wrote:
> To me it seems a ship cockpit canopy or AT-AT 'head' would have to be at least
> six studs wide rather than use the one-piece ~5-stud passenger compartments
> found in the Adventurers' cars. In looking at that piece in front of me with a
> minifig sitting in it, the minifig's arms can rest on top of his "door", like
> a human passenger can do with a 1:1 car with the windows down, but not inside
> the door.
This may be appocryphal, because I don't have the piece in front of me, but doesn'
t the piece in question have a stud (representing door handles) on the outside of
the "door" panels? If so (Again, I'm not sure about this), one could seal up the
cockpit by placing plates vertically on the studs... Anyway, just an odd idea
thinking outside the box (no pun intended) at midnight.
--Karim
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Could TLG Answer our prayers?...A Millenium Falcon
|
| (...) least (...) with a (...) like (...) inside (...) doesn' (...) outside of (...) the (...) It's not appocryphal. And I'm a bit surprised that it's *you* that even thought it could be ;-) Yes, that piece has studs representing door handles. I (...) (26 years ago, 21-Apr-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Could TLG Answer our prayers?...A Millenium Falcon
|
| (...) I'm jumping in here late, so forgive me if this had already been mentioned. To me it seems a ship cockpit canopy or AT-AT 'head' would have to be at least six studs wide rather than use the one-piece ~5-stud passenger compartments found in the (...) (26 years ago, 20-Apr-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
41 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
