 | | Yet more new slopes appearing in 2003 SW?
|
|
Hi, all. Check out the nice box scan from FBTB: (URL) Look at the sonic cannon. Look at the feet. Those don't look like the rounded facet-slopes we've been seeing this year--rather, they look like half of a 3x4 wedge, which should go flush with the (...) (22 years ago, 16-Oct-02, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Yet more new slopes appearing in 2003 SW?
|
|
(...) Those slope indeed to appear to be what you describe. This should help us get some interesting roof designs. Now we only need the inverse. -Jason +---...---+ Jason Spears MichLUG - (URL) Page - (URL) (...) (22 years ago, 16-Oct-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Yet more new slopes appearing in 2003 SW?
|
|
Maybe our clamoring for split slopes finally sunk in? ;-) Now all they need to do is make split versions of all the train slopes, and John Neal's head will explode over all the new 8/10/14/20-wide possibilities ;-) (...) -- | Tom Stangl, Sun ONE (...) (22 years ago, 16-Oct-02, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Yet more new slopes appearing in 2003 SW?
|
|
"Mr L F Braun" <braunli1@pilot.msu.edu> wrote in message news:H42Gxx.7An@lugnet.com... (...) To me it looks like it is a 2x4 piece, so in one plane it will be flush with a 45deg slope and in the other with an 18deg (new-ish 2x4) slope But, I hope (...) (22 years ago, 17-Oct-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Yet more new slopes appearing in 2003 SW?
|
|
(...) I hate to put out your enthusiasm's fire but ... (URL) think this is that piece, there doesn't appear to be a seam on the long side, just on the short side. (...) Don't get your hopes up - although I do wish they'd bring out a nice (...) (22 years ago, 9-Nov-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Yet more new slopes appearing in 2003 SW?
|
|
(...) I called my bookie in Vegas...odds are 10 to 1 that it's a new slope. Bets are on....=) -Matt (22 years ago, 9-Nov-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Yet more new slopes appearing in 2003 SW?
|
|
(...) Nah, if you look at that box, it's pretty clear that the facet is not two studs wide, it's only *one*. Then there's a two-stud gap, and finally a second one-stud facet for the opposing "half-6069" piece. There's no way it could really be the (...) (22 years ago, 9-Nov-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Yet more new slopes appearing in 2003 SW?
|
|
"Matt Sekerak" <matthew.sekerak@verizon.net> wrote in message news:H5BEDn.GAu@lugnet.com... (...) I'm afraid not! The Government would want it's 10% GST, either way! Looking at it again, it would seem I might have to reverse my earlier assessment (...) (22 years ago, 9-Nov-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
