Subject:
|
Re: TLG Naboo Royal Cruiser?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Tue, 24 Apr 2001 02:11:29 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
695 times
|
| |
| |
I wouldn't be surprised if they stick to the main characters completely, and
ignore everyone else. Why? Two very depressing words: Desert Skiff. Or
Imperial AT-ST. That, and I've got enough Qui-gons to have my own version
of the clone wars. So much potential, so few figs...
Sigh...
Jesse
mo <monica@galacticbrick.com> wrote in message news:GC975D.4Iu@lugnet.com...
> If they did, it would seem common sense to introduce a Queen Amidala
> mini-fig as well (I'd root for it on those grounds alone). Of course, LEGO
> could introduce the fig without the cruiser, and well...who knows? My guess
> is chances for the set are slim, UNLESS the cruiser plays a major role in
> the next two episodes. I think whether the NRC gets developed depends on
> that, since it seems LEGO has already over-extended the Ep. 1 line quite a lot.
>
>
> mo
> www.galacticbrick.com
> Your Star Wars LEGO Connection
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: TLG Naboo Royal Cruiser?
|
| If they did, it would seem common sense to introduce a Queen Amidala mini-fig as well (I'd root for it on those grounds alone). Of course, LEGO could introduce the fig without the cruiser, and well...who knows? My guess is chances for the set are (...) (24 years ago, 23-Apr-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|