To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.starwarsOpen lugnet.starwars in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Star Wars / 10645
  Re: Opinion on 2001 sets
 
(...) But at least we weren't given an ewok. (...) But at least we weren't given an ewok. (...) This is the major flaw of the model. IMO, the legs/feet are decent, and the head is quite good (except for the interior, which is really slapdash.) The (...) (24 years ago, 22-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  What? No Ewoks?
 
(...) Oh, you must've gotten the AT-ST without the stickers. A few boxes slipped past Lego Quality Control without them. Here's a scan of the sticker sheet for the AT-ST. They go on the bottom of the feet. :) (URL) YES, I have too much time on my (...) (24 years ago, 23-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars) ! 
 
  Re: What? No Ewoks?
 
...and, sorry they're not to scale. I know some of you Ewok fans out there are eager to print these out. I painted something similar on the bottom of my Ertl AT-ST Snap-Titea couple of years ago. - Sean (24 years ago, 23-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: What? No Ewoks?
 
(...) <Mr Burns> Eeeeexcellent. </Mr Burns> ~Mark "Muffin Head" Sandlin (24 years ago, 23-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: What? No Ewoks?
 
(...) Nice to know that there are others with a similar sense of humor.......as my wife wonders why I am laughing uproariously....... John (24 years ago, 23-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: What? No Ewoks?
 
(...) LOL... if only Lego would really do something like that... of course I doubt Lucasfilm would allow it. It's too bad Jar-Jar never met up with an AT-AT... I'd love to see him squashed under foot... >:) -Bryan hobartrus@hotmail.com (URL) (24 years ago, 23-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: What? No Ewoks?
 
(...) <Ms. Krabapple> Ha! </Ms. Krabapple> eric (24 years ago, 23-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR