 | | Re: Opinion on 2001 sets
|
| (...) But at least we weren't given an ewok. (...) But at least we weren't given an ewok. (...) This is the major flaw of the model. IMO, the legs/feet are decent, and the head is quite good (except for the interior, which is really slapdash.) The (...) (24 years ago, 22-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | What? No Ewoks?
|
| (...) Oh, you must've gotten the AT-ST without the stickers. A few boxes slipped past Lego Quality Control without them. Here's a scan of the sticker sheet for the AT-ST. They go on the bottom of the feet. :) (URL) YES, I have too much time on my (...) (24 years ago, 23-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars) !
| | | | | Re: What? No Ewoks?
|
| ...and, sorry they're not to scale. I know some of you Ewok fans out there are eager to print these out. I painted something similar on the bottom of my Ertl AT-ST Snap-Titea couple of years ago. - Sean (24 years ago, 23-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Re: What? No Ewoks?
|
| (...) <Mr Burns> Eeeeexcellent. </Mr Burns> ~Mark "Muffin Head" Sandlin (24 years ago, 23-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Re: What? No Ewoks?
|
| (...) Nice to know that there are others with a similar sense of humor.......as my wife wonders why I am laughing uproariously....... John (24 years ago, 23-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Re: What? No Ewoks?
|
| (...) LOL... if only Lego would really do something like that... of course I doubt Lucasfilm would allow it. It's too bad Jar-Jar never met up with an AT-AT... I'd love to see him squashed under foot... >:) -Bryan hobartrus@hotmail.com (URL) (24 years ago, 23-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Re: What? No Ewoks?
|
| (...) <Ms. Krabapple> Ha! </Ms. Krabapple> eric (24 years ago, 23-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
| |
