 | | Re: 2001 Sets
|
|
Hi! Jonathan Wilson schrieb: (...) Hmm, I rather think LEGO would like to use this opportunity to give us a few more Rebels. But on the other hand they would have to include six minifigs (Leia, Luke, Han, Chewie, R2D2 and C3PO ). Han and Leia in (...) (24 years ago, 17-Aug-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: My prediction on how the AT-ST walker looks like
|
|
(...) Ah, yes... :) UCS Naboo Fighter; $100 UCS AAT; $120 UCS AT-ST; $80 UCS TIE; $80 UCS A-Wing; $80 UCS Y-Wing; $180 UCS B-Wing; $180-200... Given the size of the real models, wouldn't that make sense? Also, cheaper-than-$100 UCS models would (...) (24 years ago, 17-Aug-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: My prediction on how the AT-ST walker looks like
|
|
I agree with your judgement on my model. The head is obviously the most horrible thing of the model. Hopefully Lego will design new pieces for the front of the head (I can't really figure much to do about the slight slop and the windows). The (...) (24 years ago, 17-Aug-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: My prediction on how the AT-ST walker looks like
|
|
To pick up a recent discussion: your AT ST looks horrible, but... this is a completly new way of building. Taking the limitations we believe a future official set will have and create a MOC based on it. You have done a great job, doing this and I (...) (24 years ago, 17-Aug-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: My prediction on how the AT-ST walker looks like
|
|
(...) scale. (...) I am impressed. My only worry would be that the real thing will have to have good balance, your one looks like it may topple quite easily - but I may be wrong. Scott A (24 years ago, 17-Aug-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
