|
|
 | | Re: OK, lets take it to Off Topic.
|
| How can you tell? The post only says "keep it to Star Wars Lego." Fighting for off-topic rights everywhere, ~Mark (...) (24 years ago, 13-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Re: OK, lets take it to Off Topic.
|
| (...) OK, fine, but I'll be watching, and just you wait. One little slip-up on the topic of Lego Race or Adventurers and WHAM! To keep this on-topic, um... UCS B-WING, C'MON, GIMME ONE! Jason F. PS - that or a UCS Naboo Fighter (24 years ago, 13-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Re: OK, lets take it to Off Topic.
|
| (...) <grin> I think he's ref'ing to the Taco-Bell arguement and to the language discussion... in which cases he's totally justified. :-) (of course, I'm a biased compartmentalized freak ;-) -Shiri (24 years ago, 13-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Re: OK, lets take it to Off Topic.
|
| <monty python>NOOOOOOO-ONE EXPECTS the off-topic police!!!!</monty python> Per the lugnet.starwars charter, which you can see on the opening lugnet.starwars page, it specifically allows "Star Wars Fanaticism." I think a bunch of people arguing over (...) (24 years ago, 13-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Babylon 5 (was Re: A couple stupid SW questions...)
|
| (...) Heh. S'ok. I was mostly kidding. (...) Err. I saw a nanofig Narn fighter as well. That's about it. There have been several ships "based on" the Starfury, though I can't remember the URLs offhand. I've changed the subject and set a follow-up to (...) (24 years ago, 13-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.space)
|
|
