To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.starwarsOpen lugnet.starwars in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Star Wars / *7388 (-5)
  Re: Millennium Falcon Opinion
 
(...) pieces (...) red (...) more (...) plates, (...) What we complain about are things that reach us on an emotional level. Those of us who are against "juniorization" are against it because we see this as a cheapening of the toys we grew up with (...) (24 years ago, 19-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: Millennium Falcon Opinion
 
(...) I don't really understand everyones perturbance about "juniorization" or whatever else you dont like about the pieces you get. I bought this set because I wanted the special pieces and the figures. frankly, any other pieces that it comes with (...) (24 years ago, 19-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: Millennium Falcon Opinion
 
(...) not (...) a (...) Scuse me? Since when was building things out of LEGO considered "suffering?" I sure wasn't "suffering" when I was a kid and got my 6980 Galaxy Commander... I was thrilled! It was the biggest spaceship of the LEGO lineup at (...) (24 years ago, 19-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: UCS Tie Interceptor first opinions.
 
I guess I am just too stuck on the Star Wars Vehicles looking as close to real as possible. And when I see those shovels there, all I can see is "SHOVELS"... and it just ruins the effect for me. Chris (...) (24 years ago, 19-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: UCS Tie Interceptor first opinions.
 
(...) Is the piece for the back of the pod the big-dome base part? The one used in Neptune's Discovery Lab (and others)? Looking at (URL), the two dome-parts are used in the tower on the right-hand side of the picture. That's not the most exciting (...) (24 years ago, 19-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR