|
|
 | | Re: Cloud City Shuttle
|
| (...) Here are my Top Ten BS explanations (endorsed by Lucas(1) himself): 10. Focus groups respond better to the meatier “twin pod” than to the wimpy “single pod” version 9. The two-pod model is actually the instructor/student training vehicle 8. A (...) (20 years ago, 18-Feb-05, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.space, lugnet.town)
| | | | | Re: Cloud City Shuttle
|
| (...) Sorry, you're not getting any B.S. from me. I've actually started on this moc as a standalone hovercraft of sorts. But I had two of the windscreens and the other odd red piece that came out to what it is. I'll probably try to change the design (...) (20 years ago, 18-Feb-05, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.space, lugnet.town, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Cloud City Shuttle
|
| (...) Thanks! AC (20 years ago, 18-Feb-05, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.space, lugnet.town, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Cloud City Shuttle
|
| Nice MOC! My question is why the twin pod design? I've always wondered what the purpose of a twin pod design in the cloud car has if there is only one engine between the two. I could see a benefit to the car if the pods were detachable, but one (...) (20 years ago, 15-Feb-05, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.space, lugnet.town, FTX)
| | | | | Re: [OT] How large would Executor-class SSD appear?
|
| Not too geeky for me! I love this sort of stuff; it helps us visualize our lego models. Accurate measurements help in the design process. Keep it up! (20 years ago, 15-Feb-05, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
|
