To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.starwarsOpen lugnet.starwars in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Star Wars / *16424 (-5)
  Re: one serious walker!
 
(...) Well, let me think... Too much starch in the AT-AT's jammies? Is it stretching its legs after sitting through a too long movie? Is it rusty, a la the Tin Woodsman? Is it wearing corduroy pants and doesn't want them to squeak? Did its mommy (...) (21 years ago, 10-Dec-03, to lugnet.starwars, FTX)
 
  Re: one serious walker!
 
(...) Ummm - no not any of those. I can not say it in a family forum, except to say that maybe he is very happy to see her. :-D Bob (21 years ago, 10-Dec-03, to lugnet.starwars, FTX)
 
  Re: one serious walker!
 
(...) Question: why is that the default position for Heather's legs, and what other positions are possible? grin Humor aside, absolutely awesome work. More! More! .Steve Coallier "Attack life, it's going to kill you anyway!" (21 years ago, 10-Dec-03, to lugnet.starwars, FTX)
 
  Re: one serious walker!
 
(...) You mean it's dead? Or frozen? Or halted in time? Dave! (21 years ago, 10-Dec-03, to lugnet.starwars, FTX)
 
  Re: one serious walker!
 
(...) I don't think it's nerves - maybe it is a boy Imperial walker and it's stiff for another reason ;-) Bob (21 years ago, 10-Dec-03, to lugnet.starwars, FTX)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR