 | | Re: New Star Wars (from FBTB)
|
|
(...) I think they're trying to keep the signature ships available. Future Star Wars LEGO fan growth is limited if you can't get certain sets. As to why a redesign instead of a re-release? Well, TLC isn't out to make collectors happy (and note there (...) (21 years ago, 12-Sep-03, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Official: UCS Snowspeeder and *New* Millennium Falcon
|
|
(...) Yes, that is true. BUT..... I rather have parts from a new set, not an old set with a slightly new spin on it. This MF among others is not a new set, its a old set with a "new and improved" label on it. I just hope this is a road Lego is not (...) (21 years ago, 12-Sep-03, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Official: UCS Snowspeeder and *New* Millennium Falcon
|
|
(...) Parts are parts in my book. -Tim (21 years ago, 12-Sep-03, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Official: UCS Snowspeeder and *New* Millennium Falcon
|
|
(...) I rather they have 'New Set' fever. I am not liking this pattern of old sets re-done. I already have the MF, I already have the snowspeeder, I already have the X-Wing.... I do not want or need different versions of the same set. What I do want (...) (21 years ago, 12-Sep-03, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Official: UCS Snowspeeder and *New* Millennium Falcon
|
|
(...) I am not thrilled. This Falcon seems worse than the first one. Look at the cab?? Does that look like a Millenium Falcon cab to you? If I had to choose, I would definatelly choose the first Millenium Falcon by far. I just do not see the ship (...) (21 years ago, 12-Sep-03, to lugnet.starwars)
|
