|
|
 | | Re: how large would the ISD be compared to the Enterprise-D?
|
| (...) *one of top 5 TNG episodes--Relics Dave K p.s. whoever said the overlay of the Starship Enterprise and the Aircraft Carrier Enterprise was right--it was the original 1701, no bloody A, B, C, orrr D... I'll try looking thru my archives and see (...) (22 years ago, 16-Oct-02, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.space)
| | | | | Re: how large would the ISD be compared to the Enterprise-D?
|
| How's this look? (URL) (22 years ago, 16-Oct-02, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.space)
| | | | | Re: how large would the ISD be compared to the Enterprise-D?
|
| (...) Joe, Given the dimensions Adrian posted earlier, I'd say one of your graphics is the wrong size. He's got the ISD at 1600 meters, NCC1701D at 641 meters, just over 40% as long. James (22 years ago, 16-Oct-02, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.space)
| | | | | Re: how large would the ISD be compared to the Enterprise-D?
|
| (...) Super Star Destroyer: 12,800 Meters Death Star 1: 120,000 Meters in Diameter Death Star 2: 160,000 Meters in Diameter -Jason (URL) (22 years ago, 16-Oct-02, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.space)
| | | | | Re: how large would the ISD be compared to the Enterprise-D?
|
| (...) Using the picture Joe posted, I redid the scales. 1600/641 = ~2.496. With that in mind, I think this picture is a little more on scale. (URL) Spears MichLUG - (URL) Page - (URL) (22 years ago, 16-Oct-02, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.space)
|
|
