To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.starwarsOpen lugnet.starwars in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Star Wars / *14129 (-5)
  Re: LEGO Star Wars 2003
 
(...) Other thoughts: One of only two (I think) place-sets in the SW line (the other being the Naboo Swamp) (yes, there are some little things like the tree in the original Speeder-Bikes set, the "rebel base" in the B-Wing set, and those (...) (22 years ago, 3-Oct-02, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: LEGO Star Wars 2003
 
(...) I was literally taking pictures of a building yesterday at lunch that those columns would be perfect for. Jonathan (22 years ago, 3-Oct-02, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: LEGO Star Wars 2003
 
(...) The set number, 4480, seems odd. I wonder why it's not 71XX. Hmmm... obscure characters like EV-9D9, a Gonk, and a B'Omarr monk, but no palace guards, no Rancor, and still no Lando. Maybe we'll get them in another similar set. Jeff J (already (...) (22 years ago, 3-Oct-02, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: LEGO Star Wars 2003
 
(...) Pretty cool set but I like my GONK from almost 3 years ago better ;-) (URL) about time we got a few more Classic Droids. Eric K. (22 years ago, 3-Oct-02, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: LEGO Star Wars 2003
 
(...) I must buy as SEVERAL of this set alone... JABBA-FIG... SLAVE LEIA.... those droids look GREAT. looka like the set is a bunch of leftover harry potter stuff... but it's still a great playset... I notice a "lando-in disguise" is NOT present... (...) (22 years ago, 3-Oct-02, to lugnet.starwars)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR