To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.starwarsOpen lugnet.starwars in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Star Wars / *13533 (-10)
  Re: Pics of 10026 - SE Naboo Starfighter
 
*ahem* YYYYYYEEE...EEESSS.....S!!!...!!! !!!...!!! *hrm* Dave (hoping against hope that an all-chrome Amidala Queen's Cruiser is in the works) "Jeremy Scott" <Copyright@cox.net> wrote in message news:Gxyq9v.Izw@lugnet.com... (...) (22 years ago, 20-Jun-02, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: Official 10026 pics
 
Niii...iiiccc...ccce...ee!!!!!!!! those new chromium (sp?) peices will sure add some flavor to future creations, espicially the cones, for me at least. On the downside though, I think Lego took the easy way out when designing the canopy IMHO. Does (...) (22 years ago, 19-Jun-02, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: Pics of 10026 - SE Naboo Starfighter
 
(...) Not really trying to debate anything, just responding to your "I don't understand why people had to steal FBTB's thunder on this one" post. I guess my point is who really cares who makes the announcement first, it's not like anyone gains (...) (22 years ago, 19-Jun-02, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: Hi here!
 
I don't know if you noticed or not Eric, but each time I replyed to your message it would start a new thread. Do you or anyone else out there have an idea why, or am I just going to have to live with this disfunction of my e-mail service/lugnet? (...) (22 years ago, 19-Jun-02, to lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: Pics of 10026 - SE Naboo Starfighter
 
I'm not sure whether you took what I said literally or your debating what I said...but anyways... (...) They get to make a official announment on their site about a new product. How is that not "thunder." -Geordan- (...) snip (22 years ago, 19-Jun-02, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: Pics of 10026 - SE Naboo Starfighter
 
(...) I'm as disappointed as I expected to be. As a must-have-SW-LEGO collector I will certainly get one, but only one. $40 is way too much for the same size ship. Sure, it is 'affordable' as a fancy model compared to the $200 RBR, but $20 extra for (...) (22 years ago, 19-Jun-02, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: Official 10026 pics
 
(...) YES!! Another maze!!! Coo.OoOoOooo.ooOLLL! I love it!! ;)~ (...) I am loving the new chrome parts! But do you think they will put out more ep1 sets? If it means chrome and mazes - then I sure hope they do! Maybe now I can do something with the (...) (22 years ago, 19-Jun-02, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: Official 10026 pics
 
(...) Well, scans of stickers are technically a copyright infringement. TLC happens to be pretty lenient about publishing scans of their instructions and whatnot, but they have never expressly licensed anyone to do so (well, perhaps they have now (...) (22 years ago, 19-Jun-02, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Official 10026 pics
 
(...) Ben's poor word choice aside (never such a thing as a 'nice accusation ;) ) and the idea that I mostly agree with him... Can we please, for the love of all things brickish, not let this particular issue cause a heated debate? IMHO, there have (...) (22 years ago, 19-Jun-02, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: Pics of 10026 - SE Naboo Starfighter
 
(...) Ahh, ok - I forgot about the Blockade Runner. Nearly all Starwars sets were in the 71xx number range (including the UCS sets), so I thought 10026 seemed peculiar. -Bryan (22 years ago, 19-Jun-02, to lugnet.starwars)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR