|
| | Re: Review of Darth Vader, set 8010
|
| Oops, I forgot to include .starwars. Anyway, here's the review: In lugnet.reviews, Thomas Avery writes: A nice looking set at a medium price. check it out: (URL) BASICS: Set No.: 8010 Set Name: Darth Vader Theme: Star Wars (Technic) Price: $40 USD (...) (23 years ago, 12-Feb-02, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | Re: "Star Wars Parts" used in other themes - Toy Fair
|
| (...) I think, though, that the only parts that that would cover would be those actually bearing WB trademarked properties, like the HP character minifig heads, sorting hat, that sort of thing. Or, for SW, the yoda minifig head, the Sebulba peice, (...) (23 years ago, 12-Feb-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars)
| | | | Re: "Star Wars Parts" used in other themes - Toy Fair
|
| Remember that some of the Harry Potter pieces are copyright Lego and Warners, so pieces are not necessarily pieces -- James Stacey ---...--- www.minifig.co.uk #925 - I'm a citizen of Legoland travelling Incommunicado "Matthew Gerber" (...) (23 years ago, 12-Feb-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars)
| | | | Re: Republic Gunship
|
| (...) When I found out a couple of months ago that we weren't getting Mace Windu this year all my enthusiasm for the Ep.2 lineup suddenly disappeared out the window (I know it sounds crazy but thats how much he's needed). However, I am confident (...) (23 years ago, 12-Feb-02, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | Re: "Star Wars Parts" used in other themes - Toy Fair
|
| (...) lines, so it's not necessarily a "SW part." Ditto the 6-long curved slopes. There may be a two-year delay for parts specifically intended for SW items, especially those that include a Lucasfilm trademark, but not basic building elements that (...) (23 years ago, 11-Feb-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars)
| |