 | | Re: Star Wars v. Harry Potter
|
|
I guess my only real beef was the Falcon. In my opinion it was absolutely horrible. The minifigs were great though. I theorized that since Potter can be considered an extension of Lego's castle themes maybe they had better in house production on it. (...) (24 years ago, 23-Nov-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Star Wars v. Harry Potter
|
|
Wow. I didn't realize the ewoks were smaller. They look the same size as the rest of em. Veddy cool. I'm not into the potter stuff but of course I had to get em all. Fluffy is quite nifty. Its frustrating to see info about sets float around but not (...) (24 years ago, 23-Nov-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Where’s Mo…?
|
|
Having just now picked myself up off the floor after laughing so hard I just gotta say, WHERE'S MO! (...) (24 years ago, 23-Nov-01, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Re: Star Wars v. Harry Potter
|
|
(...) My impression was exactly the opposite. SW line (ESPECIALLY the 1999 sets) were amazingly done. There was little if any juniorization, and the sets were *much* more accurate than I would have expected. Granted it's since gone downhill a (...) (24 years ago, 23-Nov-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Star Wars v. Harry Potter
|
|
(...) I know. Yes the Ewoks and the goblins from Gringott's bank are described as mini-minifigs. And Hagrid (the big brown guy) is significantly larger than a human or Chewbacca. Chewie was a head or two taller than Han right? Hagid is 9 1/2 or 10 (...) (24 years ago, 23-Nov-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
