To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.starwarsOpen lugnet.starwars in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Star Wars / *11693 (-5)
  Re: TLG Article in "Fast Company".
 
(...) I just read this article. People can find it on the web here: (URL) was a very good treatment about what Lego has to do to keep up with the times. Many of the themes that we complain about here are found in this article. They spent a great (...) (23 years ago, 29-Aug-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.publish, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.technic.bionicle)  
 
  Re: Modular sets
 
(...) (23 years ago, 29-Aug-01, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: Episode II named
 
(...) Yes, but one can still hope that George will recover the artistic vision of ANH and TESB. I won't pilgrimage to the theaters with the same zealous optimism as I had when Ep 1 was released, but I still look forward to Ep. 2's release. If (...) (23 years ago, 29-Aug-01, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: Episode II named
 
(...) Gee, by that criteria these movies may actually have been well-named because MST3K is undoubtedly where they are headed! I have seen Episode I exactly once, maybe someday I will see the subsequent films for free on TV or something because I do (...) (23 years ago, 29-Aug-01, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: Episode II named
 
(...) That's what I've hoped since 1983 when RoTJ came out. George is just playing with us. Those ewoks are just stand-ins. He'll bring the Wookies out when the *real* movie is released. james, who shudders at the image of Lego ewoks. (23 years ago, 29-Aug-01, to lugnet.starwars)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR