Subject:
|
Re: A field arrangement Question!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.sports, lugnet.fabuland
|
Date:
|
Mon, 14 Aug 2000 22:07:54 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4905 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.football, Sheree Rosenkrantz writes:
> You are not alone! [ on building or age ;-) , 30 sounds good from where I
> am...] The pictures have no numbers. Some parts they choose to show how to
> build and others are left out completely. Skimpy on the number of pages
> too.
>
> I miss the story line that Fabuland had. I don't understand why the new
> Mickey stuff doesn't include a story. TLC is gearing this to the 4-7 yr
> old, prime reading skill development time, and yet they don't link it up.
> Oppportunity lost . . .
>
> sheree
Hey sheree,
I agree that the instructions leave a little to be desired. I am a 26 year
old steel fabricator who can desipher detailed blueprints. But when it comes
to building these sets I feel like throwing it against the wall. I think
however that these sets are more for stimulating a childs imagination. I do
like the story book idea.
Thanks,
Gerry
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: A field arrangement Question!
|
| Rose Regner <lego@r2eng.com> wrote in message news:Fyu9GI.6Mu@lugnet.com... <snip> (...) to (...) You are not alone! [ on building or age ;-) , 30 sounds good from where I am...] The pictures have no numbers. Some parts they choose to show how to (...) (24 years ago, 14-Aug-00, to lugnet.sports, lugnet.fabuland)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
