Subject:
|
Re: Wings [was: Re: Building big]
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space, lugnet.loc.au
|
Date:
|
Tue, 26 Jun 2001 16:42:06 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
8243 times
|
| |
|
|
Heya Selçuk-
In lugnet.space, Selçuk Göre writes:
>
> Jesse Alan Long wrote:
> > There was a man who asked me about eating soy and I simply said that I did
> > not like soy because I am not exactly a vegetarian, that and I decided to be
> > humorous (as opposed to being annoying or rude, which many people on Lugnet
> > seem to think I am in life, which is certainly not true) in my response to
> > his letter because his letter was also humorous in structure and besides,
> > are you real or just another of the chorous of the voices in my mind? I
> > seem to be real enough to type this message so it appears that I must exist
> > on some plane of existence in life. There are two messages that I do not
> > understand in my mind. The first message was, 'I really don't appreciate
> > beating innocent clueless, and my attitude same to this conversation.' What
> > do you indicate by that statement?
>
> It was 'I really don't appreciate beating innocent clueless, and my
> attitude *was* same to this conversation.'
I'm actually sort of stumped at that line too--it doesn't
quite compute grammatically. I think that's what Jesse
wasn't getting (that's definitely what I'm not understanding).
> At first, I thought that you were a teen, just were rambling around, and
> there was no need to be harsh to you.
>
> But after this much weird and funny postings, and reading that you were
> 21, I started to believe that this comical "Jesse Long" character that
> you presented here in lugnet is either fictional, created to make some
> fun with us, (so I said I believed "Jesse long" is not real, I already
> know that there is someone hitting the keys in front oh his/her PC) or
> you are really a child trying to sell him/herself as an adult.
>
> I still believe the same thing.
No comment, except that this has been a most interesting
week and a half on LUGnet.
> > The second question is was there another
> > person with my name on the early days of Lugnet and what is this RTL that
> > you speak of, Selcuk? I spologize that the computer that I use does not
> > have one of those weird marks underneath the "c" in your name and I have
> > also not known how to write one of those marks on my computer, Selcuk. Who
> > was this other Jesse Long? Is he an evil alien clone of me that is out to
> > kill me? I share a name with the girl of Team Rocket and now some other
> > person has my name on Lugnet.
> > Jesse Long
>
> Yes there was a Jesse Long, before this Lugnet thing, during RTL days
> (rec.toys.lego, a news group created to discuss things about Lego, which
> still exists) and he is still here lurking around.
I remember that Jesse--has anyone spoken with him in the last
year or so? And as for that Pokemon thing (I think Team Rocket
is a Pokemon thing)...hmmm.
> "ç" is not weird by the way. At least not much weird than letters like
> "x, q and w" that we don't have in our alphabet..:-)
It's more the sedilla than the letter, methinks. ;) We-all's
don't go for that thar Frenchie stuff down he-ah. Y'all a
communist or sumthin'? (Don't ask how they react to umlauts.)
best
LFB
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Wings [was: Re: Building big]
|
| (...) Needless to say it is very appearent to me. Do I undesrtand your own language better than you or what?..:-) Anyway, the thing I tried to express (and couldn't, by looking the respose) is: * I really don't appreciate beating (kicking, slapping, (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jun-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.loc.au)
| | | Re: Wings [was: Re: Building big]
|
| (...) I think that you do not understand that sentence, either, Lindsay? The problem is that you respond with the sentence, 'I think that's what Jesse wasn't getting (that's definitely what I'm not understanding).' What do you mean by that sentence, (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jun-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.loc.au)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Wings [was: Re: Building big]
|
| (...) It was 'I really don't appreciate beating innocent clueless, and my attitude *was* same to this conversation.' At first, I thought that you were a teen, just were rambling around, and there was no need to be harsh to you. But after this much (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jun-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.loc.au)
|
195 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
