Subject:
|
Re: Looking for a terminology clarification
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Wed, 2 Nov 2005 23:34:20 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
Geoffrey Hyde <GDOTHYDE@BIGPONDDOnospamTNETDOTAU>
|
Viewed:
|
2232 times
|
| |
|
|
http://memory-alpha.org/en/wiki/Warp_drive
Here's an excellent description of the Star Trek warp drives - from what I
can see in it it has components which fulfil the requirements of being an
engine, and other components which fulfil the requirements of being a drive.
:-)
Google is quite a useful tool when it comes to treknology! :-D
--
Cheers ...
Geoffrey Hyde
"Rob Antonishen" <rob.antonishen@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:3644709b0511021150n756dae16l62aced3bf919f2b1@mail.gmail.com...
> And this is my question :) Is it a warp _drive_ or a warp _engine_?
> Peter's division would indicate that a drive needs an engine...
>
> I've always called them "warp drives" ( and ion drives etc.) but
> was trying to think of why they are not correctly called "warp
> engines"...
>
> -Rob A>
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Looking for a terminology clarification
|
| (...) And this is my question :) Is it a warp _drive_ or a warp _engine_? Peter's division would indicate that a drive needs an engine... I've always called them "warp drives" ( and ion drives etc.) but was trying to think of why they are not (...) (19 years ago, 2-Nov-05, to lugnet.space)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
