 | | Re: One angry man's complaint about the "MOC highlight" —Nathan Wells
|
| | | (...) In danger of being pelted with bley bricks, I just was to say that I agree with what Mladen and Keith said. And now back to building... -- Nathan Wells (20 years ago, 28-Apr-05, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: One angry man's complaint about the "MOC highlight" —Tom McDonald
|
| | | | | (...) (pelts Nathan with reddish-brown bricks instead) ;-) -Tom McD. (20 years ago, 28-Apr-05, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: One angry man's complaint about the "MOC highlight" —Chris Giddens
|
| | | | (...) (URL) Nathan, I'm sorry for your poor treatment as shown above. It was just Tuesday and I'm sure it still stings. As for all this "elitism" and "clubhouse" talk. I don't get it. Its about bricks and building better. CSF is not in competition (...) (20 years ago, 28-Apr-05, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: One angry man's complaint about the "MOC highlight" —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | (...) Don't bother writing me! Frank's in charge of taking resignations from people who really shouldn't be resigning. AND he's not accepting any right now. (20 years ago, 28-Apr-05, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: One angry man's complaint about the "MOC highlight" —Wayne McCaul
|
| | | | I wasn't going to post (Lord knows I hardly ever do), but I did want to comment: I joined CSF when it first went up, but it quickly didn't seem all that friendly. No where near as friendly as lugnet.space; I realized that part of it is probably that (...) (20 years ago, 28-Apr-05, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | |
