 | | Re: One angry man's complaint about the "MOC highlight"
|
|
(...) Actually, I questioned (questioned) whether or not he should be spotlighted when he doesnt post the moc to Lugnet, then I went off on an anti CSF rant. (...) Fair enough, all I was looking for was a little explanation...well, that and poke at (...) (20 years ago, 28-Apr-05, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: One angry man's complaint about the "MOC highlight"
|
|
(...) NOTE: Yes, this post is pointless and only fuels the fire, but I have to defend Keith. He's right. How wrong you are Keith. Don't you know the silent majority is always behind you! You speak for the common LUGNETer my friend! HUAH! BTW, I (...) (20 years ago, 28-Apr-05, to lugnet.space, FTX) !
|
| |
| | Re: One angry man's complaint about the "MOC highlight"
|
|
(...) In danger of being pelted with bley bricks, I just was to say that I agree with what Mladen and Keith said. And now back to building... -- Nathan Wells (20 years ago, 28-Apr-05, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: One angry man's complaint about the "MOC highlight"
|
|
(...) (pelts Nathan with reddish-brown bricks instead) ;-) -Tom McD. (20 years ago, 28-Apr-05, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: One angry man's complaint about the "MOC highlight"
|
|
(...) (URL) Nathan, I'm sorry for your poor treatment as shown above. It was just Tuesday and I'm sure it still stings. As for all this "elitism" and "clubhouse" talk. I don't get it. Its about bricks and building better. CSF is not in competition (...) (20 years ago, 28-Apr-05, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: One angry man's complaint about the "MOC highlight"
|
|
(...) Don't bother writing me! Frank's in charge of taking resignations from people who really shouldn't be resigning. AND he's not accepting any right now. (20 years ago, 28-Apr-05, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: One angry man's complaint about the "MOC highlight"
|
|
I wasn't going to post (Lord knows I hardly ever do), but I did want to comment: I joined CSF when it first went up, but it quickly didn't seem all that friendly. No where near as friendly as lugnet.space; I realized that part of it is probably that (...) (20 years ago, 28-Apr-05, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: One angry man's complaint about the "MOC highlight"
|
|
(...) First off, I've got nothing whatsoever to say about Keith's post. That's his deal and I really don't have an opinion one way or another. And obviously I don't need to say anything to shut down your yawn-worthy elitist comment. It's that tired. (...) (20 years ago, 28-Apr-05, to lugnet.space) !
|
