 | | Re: My latest venture into trains: 4-6-4 Locomotive
|
|
It is impressive. At first I thought, "that's a good train, for a non-train builder". Then I saw the robot mode and said "ooo!". My eyes focused on the joints that glued it together because that's the hard part of transformation. You generally need (...) (20 years ago, 25-Mar-05, to lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.space, lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
|
 | | Re: My latest venture into trains: 4-6-4 Locomotive
|
|
In lugnet.announce.moc, Adrian Drake wrote: (stuff) Steam in general doesn't do much for me, and the proportions of the cab and boiler are way way off... so really it's not much of a train, taken as a train. I'll leave the comments on how good it is (...) (20 years ago, 25-Mar-05, to lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.space, lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
|
 | | Re: My latest venture into trains: 4-6-4 Locomotive
|
|
(...) SPOILER BELOW Wow! That's scary. Its both a great train, and a great robot. I saw it on Brickshelf first and clicked to see the train and boy! was I surprised. Congratulations on a wonderful model. I think you should have made both camps very (...) (20 years ago, 25-Mar-05, to lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.space, lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
|
 | | Re: [WARNING: OBJECTIONABLE CONTENT] New MOC: The Shpleem's Night Out
|
|
(...) I thought it was Pokey and his unknown blue friend from Gumby. It looks like Pokey is getting the "poking". :( or :) -Patrick (20 years ago, 25-Mar-05, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.vignette, FTX)
|
|
 | | My latest venture into trains: 4-6-4 Locomotive
|
|
I'm rather proud of this creation. I worked very hard to make the locomotive look as cool as possible. Many thanks to Shaun Sullivan, whose designs were my inspiration. (2 URLs) Enjoy!> Adrian (URL) (20 years ago, 25-Mar-05, to lugnet.announce.moc, lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.space, lugnet.trains, FTX) !!
|
|
 | | Re: [WARNING: OBJECTIONABLE CONTENT] New MOC: The Shpleem's Night Out
|
|
(...) <snip> I remember seeing something similar to this on the Mutual of Omaha Wild Kingdom when I was but just a lad. To the best of my recolection there were no wine bottles involved though. Soren, I applaud you for the shear boldness of this (...) (20 years ago, 25-Mar-05, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.vignette, FTX)
|
|
 | | Re: [WARNING: OBJECTIONABLE CONTENT] New MOC: The Shpleem's Night Out
|
|
Wonderful. An R-rated (X-rated?) vignette. An I thought I had seen it all. Disregarding the...er...shpleems themselves, I like the vignette. The studlessness is cool. (and I'm refering to the little bumps on the bricks, BTW) (20 years ago, 25-Mar-05, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.vignette, FTX)
|
|
 | | Re: [WARNING: OBJECTIONABLE CONTENT] New MOC: The Shpleem's Night Out
|
|
(...) Why?(1) The content may(2) get neutronbot on to the netNanny list but that's your site's issue, not LUGNET's, a mere link should NOT get LUGNET on that list. What's wrong with a link to it? It seems pretty solidly warned for those that might (...) (20 years ago, 25-Mar-05, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.vignette, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
|
 | | Re: [WARNING: OBJECTIONABLE CONTENT] MOC: The Shpleem's Night Out
|
|
(...) So would the 1X1 round pink plate below the female Shpleem (which I assume is some sort of mammary teat) be called an udder or a nipple? Why, oh why, do I even ask these things? (20 years ago, 25-Mar-05, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.vignette, FTX)
|
|
 | | [WARNING: OBJECTIONABLE CONTENT] New MOC: The Shpleem's Night Out
|
|
(URL) The Shpleem's Night Out> Nothing you can't see on network TV, but if you're the type who thinks Bugs Bunny really needs to wear pants, don't click through to the MOC. You have been warned. Soren (preparing for a temp-ban anyway) (20 years ago, 25-Mar-05, to lugnet.announce.moc, lugnet.space, lugnet.build.vignette, FTX) !!
|