Subject:
|
Re: pcs site
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Tue, 14 Dec 2004 00:09:42 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2058 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, Tyler Walles wrote:
Tyler,
You got the colors down pretty good, and you got a good start on the Magestic.
You have some really cool stuff goin on with it. The bomb bay deal is nice, the
exit ramp, and the tendency to be an unusual shape. I’d suggest a bit more
“refinement” in what you’re building. Each piece and part has an interconnected
purpose (even if you make it up ;-) ) and engines and greebs need to appear to
be a system. (for example, your star wars engines and the airplane engines seem
tacked on with no aparent flow with the design). Also know using a piece as
everyone sees it in mocs will communicate the same thing. (I’m referring to the
R2 head on the nose and the explorien logo)
Dude, please don’t think I’m puttin your MOC down.. no, not by a long shot. I’m
just passin on to you what I’ve learned from the builders here. Be ready to
grow! You’re a good builder, keep goin’ and growin! One of the best things
I’ve learned, no piece of lego has to be what lego intended... and when it
starts to look that way... take it off and try again. :-D
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: pcs site
|
| hey Chris thanks for the advice, I will try to incorporate it into my future designs,, but do to my limited piece count i can't get snot and other advinced techniques right. so as a side effect a lot of my moc look like they were "tacked" together (...) (20 years ago, 16-Dec-04, to lugnet.space)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: pcs site
|
| speaking of pcs starships, would my majestic light dropship be considered to be of pcs classification??? (2 URLs) just wondering Tyler (20 years ago, 13-Dec-04, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
