Subject:
|
Re: The Shipyard Should Return
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Mon, 10 May 2004 02:42:56 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1368 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, Leonard Hoffman wrote:
| |
| |
That’s it. What do you think? It would be automated, updated all the time
and very simple. It would be the home for giant LEGO spaceships again (or
for the first time).
|
I think this is a great idea! Being a big-ship builder myself, I would like
to support this idea in any way I can - short of actually being able to write
php myself.
Also, I’d suggest there be room for “sub-SHIPs” - being in the range of
75-100 studs long, as they almost count. Both of my SHIPs so far, the
Duvernay (~80 studs) and the Kalashnikov (~95 studs), clocked in at just
under the 100 stud mark (Zhukov-112 does qualify, but is smaller piece wise
than both the Duv and the Kal). But then again, this would come in by way of
the Mods who understand such things.
Perhaps this could be on the SciBrick site?
-Lenny
|
I really want to keep it 100 studs and up. We decided a while ago that
SHIPs[1] are 100 studs and up and I’d like to keep this site focused on that.
I’m not even sure that BLIPs[2] should be included. These are ships that are
over 100 studs in a dimension but are otherwise real wimpy.
I have to say also I’d like to keep it on my site. I mean I already have the URL
and everything.
[1] SHIP - Seriously Huge Investment in Parts, SomeHow I Phinished. (etc..make
up one)
[2] BLIP - By Lucifer, It’s Puny!
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: The Shipyard Should Return
|
| (...) I think this is a great idea! Being a big-ship builder myself, I would like to support this idea in any way I can - short of actually being able to write php myself. Also, I'd suggest there be room for "sub-SHIPs" - being in the range of (...) (20 years ago, 10-May-04, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
