|
|
 | | Re: Ugly Probe MOC
|
| (...) Doh! You are correct, thank you. They're (URL) here,> of course. That is the peril of multitasking, and not double checking. As if Skull Doug weren't cranky enough. Peace and oops, Professor Whateverly (URL) (22 years ago, 17-Mar-04, to lugnet.space, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Gladius
|
| (...) Wow! This is an excellent step up from the Tanto! White and blue look great together, and the fighter design is definately interesting - especially that front area with the things coming out. good stuff! Can't wait for the next moc! -Lenny (22 years ago, 17-Mar-04, to lugnet.space, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Ugly Probe MOC
|
| (...) Bad, BAD link. (Smack!) Bad, BAD Ley. (Smack!) (URL) Try this.> There, that's better. I enjoy your smattering of vaguely related links throughout your posts. I would have missed those other little creations were it not for that. And while the (...) (22 years ago, 17-Mar-04, to lugnet.space, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Ugly Probe MOC
|
| (...) I think you messed up that link, Prof. -Lenny (22 years ago, 17-Mar-04, to lugnet.space, FTX)
| | | | | Ugly Probe MOC
|
| (URL) Quiet, shmiet.> ;-) We have just recently developed a new space probe. It has a countenance only a mad scientist could love. Contrary(1) to what (URL) some might say,> I think a facial quality can really set a design off and give it a mood. (...) (22 years ago, 17-Mar-04, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
|
