Subject:
|
Re: Building Technique Innovative
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Mon, 15 Mar 2004 13:45:12 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
915 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, Fred Trayers wrote:
| |
Hi Folks-
So, I’m just wrapping up a small MOC project, and as I sit back to think about
it, I note that while I’m generally pleased about how it turned out, I don’t
think that it’s particularly innovative in its design. (I’ll post some pics
when I get some time).
|
Hey Fred - many great mocs aren’t particularly innovative - like all of mine for
instance ;) -- It has been my experience that we have a few builders who tend to
produce less, but what they do produce is often more innovative, being that they
put the pieces together in ways no one ever has. Then there are the rest of us,
who, while not particularly innovative, still produce much that is cool.
But the problem with defining innovative techniques is that we usually don’t
name our techniques. For example, one of the more innovative space mocs I’ve
seen in a while is Keith Goldman’s
Ghoul - which uses click
hinges and plates to create a hexagonal shape - as opposed to the more
traditional ‘Jassim-esque’ ship (being large plates with walls built on it) -
but how would I term this technique? Especially since it isn’t the first time
click hinges and plates have been used together, it is the first time it was
applied to such a large spaceship design.
If you are interested in innovative techniques, I’d recommend checking out the
Moc Highlight page and the
Timeline.
-Lenny
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Building Technique Innovative
|
| Hi Folks- So, I'm just wrapping up a small MOC project, and as I sit back to think about it, I note that while I'm generally pleased about how it turned out, I don't think that it's particularly innovative in its design. (I'll post some pics when I (...) (20 years ago, 15-Mar-04, to lugnet.space)
|
2 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
