 | | Re: Stacked connection points on moonbase standard?
|
|
(...) Not if you want to be able to run ground-level track on Moonbase-compliant baseplates. If you don't mind running elevated Monorail, there's no reason why you can't just drop the tracks to 7/17/27/etc. off the ground. (...) That would be the (...) (22 years ago, 5-Mar-04, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: StudWars presents : .castle vs. .space !!!
|
|
(...) I don't think I've ever personally experienced that. Maybe it's a result of coming from a more enlightened geekdom that embraces both (and sometimes combines them). Might come from growing up on Pern novels (which, ironically, the local (...) (22 years ago, 5-Mar-04, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.space, lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Stacked connection points on moonbase standard?
|
|
(...) I think the monorail platform had a lot to do with the 10, 20, 30 etc standard. I agree that by doing that standard, there is a big step up for the monorail sled. Hmm...wonder if there's any way to recess that rail... but you could always (...) (22 years ago, 5-Mar-04, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: StudWars presents : .castle vs. .space !!!
|
|
(...) I can explain it. It derives from the literary rivalry between fantasy and sci-fi. The fantasy nerds and sci-fi nerds have always each been claiming superiority over the others' literary genre. I remember the second-last time I bought a sci-fi (...) (22 years ago, 5-Mar-04, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.space, lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Stacked connection points on moonbase standard?
|
|
(...) The floors do all sit at 10-brick intervals according to the revision discussion from last year. That does mean that two stacked layers would need 4 bricks and 1 plate spacing if they maintain the same interior dimensions as the hallway (...) (22 years ago, 5-Mar-04, to lugnet.space)
|
