|
|
 | | Re: Nanosaucers! (January seed part MOC)
|
| (...) Hey, Wrong link. That actually goes to one of my Tolkien creations. While I appreciate the plug, you actually wanted this link: (URL) (22 years ago, 10-Feb-04, to lugnet.space, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Billy Bob's Scarab, a buggy prospecting ship
|
| (...) Well done Tony. It's so buggy (in a good way) that I almost swatted it ;-) That cargo bay is ingenious. Way to solve that canopy 'problem'. Great details, play value and a refreshing colour scheme. Peace and bugs, Professor Whateverly (URL) (22 years ago, 10-Feb-04, to lugnet.space, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Nanosaucers! (January seed part MOC)
|
| (...) Well James, it all depends on whether you use Peeron's method of classifying the (URL) small lever> and (URL) lever base> as two distinct parts, or TLC's method of counting them as one when they calculate the piece count in a set. (compare the (...) (22 years ago, 10-Feb-04, to lugnet.space, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Billy Bob's Scarab, a buggy prospecting ship
|
| Tony, I like the curvy, look - true to the "prototype." My favorite touches are the canopy props. Very cool how you were able to fit a realistic feature into a small space. James Wilson Dallas, TX (22 years ago, 10-Feb-04, to lugnet.space, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Steampunkers Untie! (Delurking with a new MOC)
|
| In lugnet.space, Leonard Hoffman wrote: I was with you till this part. (...) but what *I* was thinking was... gray base, green highlight and maybe a dollar sign and a little gold trim... THAT would look most amazingly excellent! (22 years ago, 10-Feb-04, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
|
