 | | Re: B.I. Joe: S.N.A.K.E. Battle Armor
|
|
(...) Um, he said 1983. He means the early years of the 1983 toy line and the first of the smaller sized Joe figures from 1983. See he said 1983. Not the dolls... but action figures, in 1983. That's what he ment. (Info taken from the Department of (...) (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.mecha, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: B.I. Joe: S.N.A.K.E. Battle Armor
|
|
(...) Thanks for clearing that up! I read it as "1983 is early in the line" ... (...) There's a depressing thought. Either someone with funnybuns (Leia) or someone who could beat you up if you made a false move. (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.mecha, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: B.I. Joe: S.N.A.K.E. Battle Armor
|
|
(...) I once knew someone with funnybuns who beat me up because I pointed them out. Dave! FUT lugnet.humor.sophomoric (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.mecha, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: B.I. Joe: S.N.A.K.E. Battle Armor
|
|
(...) Not true! Scarlett ('82) was in the very first wave of 4" Joes, and as the line progressed Cover Girl ('83) and Lady Jaye ('85) were added. For those who liked 'em dressed in black leather, there was always the Baroness ('84). And for those (...) (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| |
| | Re: B.I. Joe: S.N.A.K.E. Battle Armor
|
|
In lugnet.space, David Laswell wrote: Not true! Scarlett ('82) was in the very first wave of 4" Joes, and as the (...) David > Chris ~GA (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.mecha)
|
