| |
In lugnet.space, Chris Giddens wrote:
| |
In lugnet.space, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
| |
In lugnet.space, Gil Shaw wrote:
| |
Greetings,
Just a small addition, and for once it’s actually scifi-ish! The original
mecha bad boy from the early (1983) toyline and first miniseries for you
old geezers out there:
|
I think you captured the look nicely. But when you say “early” what do you
mean? I seem to recall the first Joe was Barbie sized... (some of my friends
(in the mid 60’s this was) had them and their sisters were always wanting
them to be made available for “dates”...)
|
Um, he said 1983. He means the early years of the 1983 toy line and the
first of the smaller sized Joe figures from 1983. See he said 1983. Not the
dolls... but action figures, in 1983. That’s what he ment. (Info taken from
the Department of Redundancy Department)
|
Thanks for clearing that up! I read it as “1983 is early in the line” ...
| |
During this era, Joes were limited to dating 3 3/4 inch Princes Leah and
Wonder Woman.
|
There’s a depressing thought. Either someone with funnybuns (Leia) or someone
who could beat you up if you made a false move.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: B.I. Joe: S.N.A.K.E. Battle Armor
|
| (...) Um, he said 1983. He means the early years of the 1983 toy line and the first of the smaller sized Joe figures from 1983. See he said 1983. Not the dolls... but action figures, in 1983. That's what he ment. (Info taken from the Department of (...) (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.mecha, FTX)
|
13 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
