 | | Re: POD —Gil Shaw
| | | | (...) Teef! Teef! Just kidding of course. I am honoured sir! This has some amazing elements to it...the double canopy (and that ingenious back-to-back mount) along with the fanned vents in the back make it an incredible pod on it's own. A (...) (21 years ago, 4-Nov-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: POD —Allister McLaren
| | | | | (...) Thanks. The canopies aren't the stongest construction, but adequate when treated with care. Unfortunately, friction alone wasn't enough to hold that size cantilever onto the hinges by a mere two studs. (...) I did consider a steed of some sort (...) (21 years ago, 4-Nov-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: POD —Gil Shaw
| | | | | (...) Haha! Okay...it's rods above fair to midland...is that better? :) Cheers, -G (21 years ago, 4-Nov-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
| | | | | | |
