|
|
 | | Re: F-2 Bat
|
| (...) Well, aside from the well-known fact that I have a thing for landing gear, the "realistic" rationalization is that it would be far cheaper to build landing gear into fighters than it would to engineer a hanging rack system for fighters with (...) (23 years ago, 21-Jul-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
| | | | | Re: F-2 Bat
|
| (...) That looks so very very cool. I'm not a space fan, but I am certainly drawn to swooshable things. And I gotta agree with you, swoosh factor of 10, man. I disagree with Mark that it needs landing gear. With the way you built it, with those 8 (...) (23 years ago, 21-Jul-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
| | | | | Re: F-2 Bat
|
| Dude, niiiice. :) I really like the simple and smooth look. Looks like a very manueverable fighter. -Anne (...) -- For SCO to attack IBM using IP (\`--/') _ _______ .-r-. is somewhat like trying to eat >.~.\ `` ` `,`,`. ,'_'~`. a live tiger. -Ian (...) (23 years ago, 21-Jul-03, to lugnet.space)
| | | | | Re: F-2 Bat
|
| (...) This is a beautiful study in simplicity = awesome. Clean, clean, clean. Great work Phil. Cheers, -G (23 years ago, 21-Jul-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
| | | | | Re: F-2 Bat
|
| (...) Groovy. I like the studless look. It does bear resemblance to Dan Jassim's Comet Fighter, but that's not a bad thing. I love the engine nozzles underneath. Smoove. Obligatory GA comment: It needs landing gear. -Grand Admiral and Keeper of (...) (23 years ago, 21-Jul-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
|
