 | | Re: New Fad? —Paul Baulch
| | | | (...) Whoa! My bad. I didn't mean to imply that fixed landing gear was unacceptable, it's totally fine by me. What I meant was that I viewed the presence of landing gear of some kind as mandatory. I've made fighters without landing gear at all, it's (...) (22 years ago, 9-Apr-03, to lugnet.space)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: New Fad? —Mike Petrucelli
| | | | | (...) easily (...) (any (...) Um... Perhaps my reply came across a little more argumentative than I intended. (...) I see, that makes much more sense than my original assumption. (...) -Mike Petrucelli (22 years ago, 9-Apr-03, to lugnet.space)
| | | | | | |
