 | | Re: Moonbase Project: Wider Corridors? —Jude Beaudin
|
| | | (...) This can only work if all wide corridors are set 2 studs back to allow room for the adapter to the standard width without affecting normal design. This would also mean you need a four stud deep connector to attach two wider corridors together. (...) (22 years ago, 18-Aug-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Moonbase Project: Wider Corridors? —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | (...) Not necessarily. You can make a modular connector sleeve which disconnects from the corridor itself with 1x1 technic bricks. So, switching out a standard connector with an adapter would be easy. Similar to the modular corridor idea on the (...) (22 years ago, 19-Aug-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Moonbase Project: Wider Corridors? —Jon Palmer
|
| | | | "Tim Courtney" <tim@zacktron.com> wrote in message news:H12Hn5.40@lugnet.com... (...) disconnects (...) 100% (...) I think it is far far to early to be changing things like the general corridor concept. The corridors are one of the main things that (...) (22 years ago, 19-Aug-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Moonbase Project: Wider Corridors? —Jimmy Figiel
|
| | | | | (...) I don't think the intent of the new corridor was changing the original formula, but adding new dimmensions to it. (...) It seems to me that this kind of posture limits a lot of creativity. It would be nice to see the moonbase project be the (...) (22 years ago, 19-Aug-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Moonbase Project: Wider Corridors? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) My view of what Jon said was that the standard is not going to be changed at this time to encompass this idea. NOT that you can't do it, or that your modules will be turned away as long as they interoperate. I would draw a parallel to Ntrak (...) (22 years ago, 19-Aug-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Moonbase Project: Wider Corridors? —Jude Beaudin
|
| | | | | | (...) Jon, Can you please confirm Larry's interpretation. Thanks, Jude (22 years ago, 19-Aug-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Moonbase Project: Wider Corridors? —Jon Palmer
|
| | | | | | "Jude Beaudin" <shiningblade@rogers.com> wrote in message news:H13DMv.1JH@lugnet.com... (...) Yup. What he said. :-) We wouldn't even begin to tell others what they can or cannot build. But now I feel we've come to a bit of a crossroads in the (...) (22 years ago, 19-Aug-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Moonbase Project: Wider Corridors? —Jude Beaudin
|
| | | | | | | (...) Consortium standards ((URL) Although, thank goodness nobody has taken the role of Microsoft, yet. :-) Perhaps you could create a links page for non-standard ideas, on it you can put a disclaimer stating the modules do not conform to the (...) (22 years ago, 19-Aug-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Moonbase Project Polls? (was: Re: Moonbase Project: Wider Corridors?) —Jon Palmer
|
| | | | | | | | "Jude Beaudin" <shiningblade@rogers.com> wrote in message news:H13KBH.1L9@lugnet.com... <snip> (...) can (...) standards (...) Or heres a thought: What would everyone think of letting the new polling system settle some of these issues? That might be (...) (22 years ago, 19-Aug-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Moonbase Project Polls? (was: Re: Moonbase Project: Wider Corridors?) —Duane Hess
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) -Duane (22 years ago, 19-Aug-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Moonbase Project Polls? (was: Re: Moonbase Project: Wider Corridors?) —Jude Beaudin
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) If you want to vote more than once, you can bribe castle people for their votes. <g> A Jar Jar for every vote for a monorail height of 1000 bricks. :-) Jude (22 years ago, 19-Aug-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Moonbase Project Polls? (was: Re: Moonbase Project: Wider Corridors?) —Chris Maddison
|
| | | | | | | | | Sounds good to me. We've got the features, we might as well use them. And I can see a lot of use in the polls for Moonbase stuff. -Chris (...) (22 years ago, 19-Aug-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Moonbase Project Polls? (was: Re: Moonbase Project: Wider Corridors?) —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) I think the idea has some potential, but you should procede with caution. There is a very real posibility that unless you word things very carefully, people will assume that you will feel bound by the result of the vote. What would you do with (...) (22 years ago, 19-Aug-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Moonbase Project Polls? (was: Re: Moonbase Project: Wider Corridors?) —Nicole Drumm
|
| | | | | | | | "Jon Palmer" <jon@zemi.net> wrote in message news:H13Kzr.3Ft@lugnet.com... (...) -- Thanx~ Nicole; "Now with Masters in Psychology Analytical Action!" (URL) Account: drumm-family Geekshelf Account: Drumm-Family Bricklink Store: drumm_family or (...) (22 years ago, 20-Aug-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Moonbase Project: Wider Corridors? —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | | | (...) Good point. (...) I think submissions should be allowed for any module which interfaces with the official standard. That should be interpreted to mean: It maintains 4-stud clearance around the edges, its square (a multiple of the 48x48 (...) (22 years ago, 19-Aug-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Moonbase Project: Wider Corridors? —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | (...) It seems to me that the basic formula worked out in the standard should be a _minimum_ for compliance, rather than a _maximum_ for inclusion. If person X designs a moonbase module that doesn't look and act just like yours, but it does: a) (...) (22 years ago, 19-Aug-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | |
