Subject:
|
Re: sleep is for chumps!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Wed, 18 Jul 2001 18:08:58 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
825 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, Greg Howell writes:
> In lugnet.space, Sarah Mather writes:
> > http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=5617
> That's cool for sooo many reasons. When I think of them I will let you know,
> but for now all I will say is that I really like it.
thanks!
> My one concern is that the micro-fig revolution seems to be getting less
> micro and more macro. Thoughts?
for me personally I like to use microfig designing for things I can't
possibly do in minifig scale. But I am still going to make it fairly large
for the sake of detail. Just because we use a smaller figure scale doen't
mean the constructions have to be smaller. I have always believed in 'the
bigger the better' idea in Lego, for the simple reason that the more parts
you use the more you are able to put detail in.
I could have made the BenGrace as a microfig ship originally, and left it at
that, but it wouldn't have served my purpose, which was to provide reference
imagery for me to photograph.
> GREG~ Micro-fig "Benevelent Grace" it's totally portable!
hey... the original BenGrace was portable too... it just took 3 trips!
:)
cheers!
Joel K (still not Sarah)
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: sleep is for chumps!
|
| (...) Okay: That's cool for sooo many reasons. When I think of them I will let you know, but for now all I will say is that I really like it. My one concern is that the micro-fig revolution seems to be getting less micro and more macro. Thoughts? (...) (23 years ago, 17-Jul-01, to lugnet.space)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
