To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.spaceOpen lugnet.space in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Space / *9512 (-10)
  Re: Wings [was: Re: Building big]
 
(...) You are correct about the Super Star Destroyer comment but I know that it was in Star Wars that they ended up inside the space slug (which I believe appears to be an early ancestor of those worms in another science fiction story named Tremors) (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jun-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.loc.au)
 
  One New MOC
 
See new MOC at (URL) (24 years ago, 25-Jun-01, to lugnet.space)
 
  Re: Building big
 
"Mr L F Braun" <braunli1@pilot.msu.edu> wrote in message news:GFGJJz.9Ar@lugnet.com... (...) Uhh... I thought that Pioneer 10 held that record[1], being slightly faster than Voyager 2 - but I might have been told that before a couple of crucial (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jun-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.loc.au)
 
  Re: On to other news....
 
(...) Check out 5571 for mainstream... over 1700 Check out Statue of Liberty for LD originated... over 2000 (both IIRC, I gotta go to my meeting no time to check) (24 years ago, 25-Jun-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.general)
 
  Re: Wings [was: Re: Building big]
 
(...) <snip> (...) Nope, you're quite right (it was least year for me and I remember perfectly). (...) Zactly! Every little dust particle can be really harsh on the ship. -Shiri (24 years ago, 25-Jun-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.loc.au)
 
  Re: Wings [was: Re: Building big]
 
Jesse Long wrote: <snip> (...) Sorry to interrupt guys, bu this is the *funniest* thread I faced for a long time..:-D Is this Jesse character is real? I mean does he really exist? I really don't appreciate beating innocent clueless, and my attitude (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jun-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.loc.au)
 
  Re: Wings [was: Re: Building big]
 
(...) No, it's not..:-) At STP (Standard temperature and pressure, 1atm and 273K if IIRC), only 22.4 lt. of any gas would have 6.022x10^23 molecules. Your number given above is quite negligible when compared to this I think. You must consider (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jun-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.loc.au)
 
  Re: On to other news....
 
(...) (24 years ago, 25-Jun-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.general)
 
  Re: On to other news....
 
5571 - 1743 pieces. (...) -- Tom Stangl ***(URL) Visual FAQ home ***(URL) Bay Area DSMs (24 years ago, 25-Jun-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.general)
 
  Re: On to other news....
 
Larry Pieniazek wrote in message ... (...) with (...) More than 1600 :-) Were there any actual Lego sets with that many pieces? I seem to remember 1400 as being about the highest. Kevin ---...--- Craftsman Lego Kits & Custom models: (URL) Lego parts (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jun-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.general)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR