|
|
 | | Re: Building big
|
| (...) And if one needs any object lesson on how little wings matter on a real spacecraft, one need only look at the fastest craft ever created by mankind--Voyager 2. Wow, that's one streamlined space dragster, isn't it? It didn't even come close to (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jun-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.loc.au)
| | | | | Re: Building big
|
| <snip> (...) <snip> (...) I'll leave the real world technical discussion to the remainder of the thread but I think it's worth mentioning that you can't criticize the lack of wings in a Star Wars design without recognizing the frame of reference (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jun-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.loc.au)
| | | | | Re: Building big
|
| (...) Ouch! They'd have a generally tough time of it without knees or elbows too, and without shoulders that can move the arm in front of the body. I suppose they can eat with appropriately long utensils but how do they dress or tie their shoes? (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jun-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.loc.au)
| | | | | Re: Wings [was: Re: Building big]
|
| (...) I've got 3 words for you, buddy: Commodore-64! (...) He-he ;] That was pretty good! KDJ ___...___ LUGNETer #203, Windsor, Ontario, Canada (24 years ago, 24-Jun-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.loc.au)
| | | | | Re: LEGO® Trademark usage (was: Wings )
|
| (...) [SNIP] (...) Hehe, I think you missed subtle point of my post. If you have been following the thread at all, you too probably busted a gut laughing when you read the "exhausting" statement above... ;] KDJ ___...___ LUGNETer #203, Windsor, (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jun-01, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.space, lugnet.general)
|
|
