|
|
 | | Re: F-2 Bat
|
| In lugnet.space, Anthony Sava wrote: (snip a whole lot of stuff) So um... what if you want to land the thing somewhere other than the mother ship? :) -Grand Admiral and Keeper of Fleebnorks (URL) "Adopt a fleebnork. They're DYING!" -Sally Struthers (22 years ago, 21-Jul-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
| | | | | Re: F-2 Bat
|
| (...) If we're talking about small fighters, might it be cheaper to have your pilots wear evac suits in a non-pressurized landing bay? Entry to the bay could be through a single airlock, and the individual ships could be moored or clamped into place (...) (22 years ago, 21-Jul-03, to lugnet.space)
| | | | | Re: F-2 Bat
|
| Thanks for the comments, guys. I'm glad you like it. And while it does look a lot like Dan's Comet Fighter, the similarity is honestly coincidence. The ship I had in mind when I was shaping it was Tim's Tadpole. As for the landing gear bit, I (...) (22 years ago, 21-Jul-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Yet another MOC: A Giant Lobster
|
| Nice job. Actually, I would also post this is .mecha. I really like the way it's more of a mech than anything else :) Really, you captured the biology of the lobster and turned it into a seriously cool mech! :) -Anne (...) -- For SCO to attack IBM (...) (22 years ago, 21-Jul-03, to lugnet.space, lugnet.aquazone)
| | | | | Re: F-2 Bat
|
| (...) Again, I'm going to have to disagree, if we're going to dive into a 'realistic' rationalization here. For you see, from my perspective, normal landing gear in a zero gravity environment are totally useless. After all, landing gear serve only (...) (22 years ago, 21-Jul-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
|
