To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.spaceOpen lugnet.space in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Space / *24337 (-5)
  Re: Theoretical Question: Missile Design
 
(...) If you go by pure physics, the fact that you're in a vacuum would make everything more stable, since there's no real resistance. Besides, a sophisticated self-guided missile should be able to auto-correct the thruster outputs based on constant (...) (21 years ago, 7-Jun-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
 
  Re: Theoretical Question: Missile Design
 
(...) It depends on what you're trying to do. If you want fast and furious, and you don't care much about accuracy, you go with a tube-shaped missile with centrally located thrusters that use constant-burn to crank up the speed before the target can (...) (21 years ago, 7-Jun-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)  
 
  Re: The EBKD Kalashnikov Project
 
"Duane Hess" <LEGOZILLA@HOTMAIL.COM> wrote in message news:HG17F2.LDA@lugnet.com... (...) step. (...) process (...) product (...) That's for sure! I'm working on a little ship right now that probably won't go over 175 pieces, but I've scrapped the (...) (21 years ago, 6-Jun-03, to lugnet.space)
 
  Re: Theoretical Question: Missile Design
 
(...) I've always used [snip] - but in FTX that bolds it. *shrug*. Ooh, just looked up at your post and you can comment out with ` -- cool! -Tim (21 years ago, 7-Jun-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
 
  Re: Dark Spiffcraft - With Lights!
 
(...) Nice work on the Spiffcraft. I thought it was bad enough having a scumcraft after you but now a Dark Spiffcraft! Ugh! Also excellent work on the hoverbikes. All good stuff. Jamie (21 years ago, 7-Jun-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR