 | | Re: Moonbase Module: The Landing Pad
|
|
Thomas, You wrote: "You'll notice that my moonbase is rough and unfinished looking. I feel that a lot more detail, particularly on the inside, could have been added." While more details could have been added, the ones that you have are pretty cool. (...) (22 years ago, 22-Mar-03, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | 2 Old Mocs
|
|
just for fun... the first is the K-XT-10 "Raven" Medium Fighter: (URL) second is my first attempt at a starcraft, the 'Sakon': (URL) (at the bottom of the page) The Sakon is a really rough model, and actually kinda ugly, too. But I'm including it on (...) (22 years ago, 22-Mar-03, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Moonbase Corridor 2.0 ?
|
|
(...) While I agree that right now, most people don't use this corridor idea in their standard, I think it's imoprtant to tell others about it and allow them the opportunity to expand the standard if they wish in their own worlds. If enough adopt (...) (22 years ago, 22-Mar-03, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Moonbase Module: The Landing Pad
|
|
(...) WOW!...wow! I like the use of the ball joint at the bearing point on the foot of the struts. The trusses are very industrial-strength looking. the cube door is very unique. I like the wedge ships the best, tho' Jeff (22 years ago, 22-Mar-03, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | New Fad?
|
|
well i agree with what the others have said very nicely done, cube door, struts and all but i'd like to say that i think the little ships are the best part those things are darn cool i'd love to see that become a fad and see some LUGfest MBases w/ (...) (22 years ago, 21-Mar-03, to lugnet.space)
|
