 | | Re: Ghato Heavy Cargo Ship
|
|
(...) Oww... I can't take the pun-ishment. -Andrusi && Sanity not included. (22 years ago, 5-Feb-03, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: 2003's gonna ruin my savings account...
|
|
(...) Yeah, as I thought earlier. I'm just happy I didn't go crazy standing there in the store aisle when I discoveed the new sets. :) The fourth series of adventurers sets definitely hits the mark here! (...) And the main reason I went to the store (...) (22 years ago, 5-Feb-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.modelteam, lugnet.adventurers, lugnet.reviews, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.space, lugnet.technic, lugnet.town, lugnet.year.2003)
|
| |
| | 2003's gonna ruin my savings account...
|
|
After seeing my Jan-Feb SAH Catalog and these three posts (and wiping the drool off my keyboard): (URL) I can say is... ...wait for it... WOW! COOL! SWEET! SUPERB! AWESOME! TERRIFIC! GREAT! YEAH! WHOOPEE! ALRIGHT! UH-HUH! YES! SUPER! *pant, pant* (...) (22 years ago, 5-Feb-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.modelteam, lugnet.adventurers, lugnet.reviews, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.space, lugnet.technic, lugnet.town, lugnet.year.2003)
|
| |
| | Re: is the cadmoonbase project still runing?
|
|
thx =) "Tim Courtney" <tim@zacktron.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:H9t6w0.3x@lugnet.com... (...) (22 years ago, 5-Feb-03, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: is the cadmoonbase project still runing?
|
|
(...) Andreas - I think Patricia Van Dyke is still working on it. Also, added lugnet.space to the list. -Tim (22 years ago, 5-Feb-03, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: new MOC
|
|
"John Henry Kruer" <jhkruer@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:H9sxIx.KGx@lugnet.com... (...) The (...) thanks, I wanted something that stuck out, for improved visibility... it could stand some work too, but I had enough trouble just making it stay (...) (22 years ago, 4-Feb-03, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: new MOC
|
|
"Bruce Hietbrink" <bnh@chem.ucla.edu> wrote in message news:H9srLt.2AG@lugnet.com... (...) yeah, I'm not crazy about the back myself, but the front is extremely tempermental and fragile, and I wanted to be able to get inside it... it might get (...) (22 years ago, 4-Feb-03, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Space MOC: The TK-421 IGP Hopper
|
|
(...) Yep, that's the Idea. And don't give me a hard time about the MC helmet etc, coz I own Zero space bricks... :P Did the animation work ok? I was worried about the usual codec probs... anyobody who knows which codecs are included in all Windows (...) (22 years ago, 4-Feb-03, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: new MOC
|
|
Woah, that's cool. The shape is very weird but fits well with the MOC. The triangle shape is a unique one! I like how you crammed the the cockpit. It has a really sci-fi look. Only one question: How does it land? :) -JHK (...) (22 years ago, 4-Feb-03, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: new 2003 sets
|
|
"Chris Giddens" <cgidd1@aol.com> wrote in message news:H9sH4D.JvB@lugnet.com... (...) Well spoken. I am definitely in favor of the open-ended minifig-laden space line. My first set (1975-ish) was a police car. I had many set since then. When I (...) (22 years ago, 4-Feb-03, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Ghato Heavy Cargo Ship
|
|
(...) <snip> (...) OK, you have to add some guns, just so you can call them Ghato blasters. Jeff J (22 years ago, 4-Feb-03, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: new MOC
|
|
Hey, You do a great job here of achieving an uncommon shape. My only complaint is that the back side doesn't look as good as the front. Bruce (22 years ago, 4-Feb-03, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Space MOC: The TK-421 IGP Hopper
|
|
Nice model, This would have made a great polybag set in the days of classic space. Bruce (22 years ago, 4-Feb-03, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: new 2003 sets
|
|
(...) I still would prefer the Classic Space sets. Mostly because of the reason you posted above - the "blank canvas." I have a gut feeling that Lego Direct will re-release the Galaxy Explorer, and I'm gonna buy that the instant it comes out! -Bryan (...) (22 years ago, 4-Feb-03, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Ghato Heavy Cargo Ship
|
|
(...) sci-fi" look to them (the usual rockets look like something you'd see on a primitive 21st-century spaceship, but these have more of a futuristic flavor to them). I also like how you remembered that important thing organics have to do every so (...) (22 years ago, 4-Feb-03, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Ghato Heavy Cargo Ship
|
|
(...) Wow, I mean, wow. that is quite a complex model. I have to say, I quite like it. (...) I noticed this as I was looking through the pics. the model I originally designed the hatch for had an unfortunate accident with a soccer ball. it is mostly (...) (22 years ago, 4-Feb-03, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: new 2003 sets
|
|
Trimmed to lugnet.space (...) Ya, I don't mind the lack of figs. I would however like aspaceman that really captures the look of a Nasa Astronaut. Scale? Doesn't matter. It's good they didn't put a fig in with the mini model (like they did way back (...) (22 years ago, 4-Feb-03, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Space MOC: The TK-421 IGP Hopper
|
|
(...) acts like a hover cycle thing? Thanks, George (22 years ago, 4-Feb-03, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Ghato Heavy Cargo Ship
|
|
(...) I forgot to add something. This ship uses the ingeniously designed TravHatch (TM). I apologize to Travis Matheson for stealing his design. :-) Curt Tigges ~~---...---~~ Home: www.commandercurt.net AtlantiSearch: www.commandercurt.net/atlantis (...) (22 years ago, 4-Feb-03, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: new 2003 sets
|
|
(...) I am delighted with the lack of mini-figs. Lack of mini-figs means the Lego designers are entirely free to choose the scale to suit the subject (and I guess the parts budget for the set). I have noticed this year that there are many more sets (...) (22 years ago, 4-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.space)
|
