Subject:
|
Re: VC vs Studio cam question
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.vc
|
Date:
|
Tue, 27 Feb 2001 00:15:55 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4817 times
|
| |
|
|
Jan Nouza <jan.nouza@vslib.cz> wrote in message
news:G9DG0s.HwI@lugnet.com...
> I wonder if anybody has tried to use the Studio cam with motorised models • and
> what was the experience. If there were no problems observed, the Studio • cam
> would seem to be a better choice for advanced robotics projects.
I haven't seen any noise effects from the Studios camera when close to
motors. Personally I think they used the fancy clear shielded cable just
for looks. I suppose it might be a little stronger too so it wouldn't be as
easily damaged.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: VC vs Studio cam question
|
| Those who built moving applications with the VC cam know that the very stiff cable complicates the design and limits practical usage. My opinion is that the LEGO added this heavy cable in order to avoid interference with elmag noise produced by (...) (23 years ago, 26-Feb-01, to lugnet.robotics.vc)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
