|
|
 | | Re: Sending Commands to Spybot from RCX - Question from a Beginner to Comm area.
|
| (...) First of all, my apologies for not answering you via email. I've been a bit busy at work. I needed to run some tests myself before I could properly respond as well. The 0x9223 from the RCX happens to match the IR sent out by the Spybot (...) (19 years ago, 28-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics.spybotics, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| | | | | Sending Commands to Spybot from RCX - Question from a Beginner to Comm area.
|
| Hi All, I am planning to send some commands to spybot via RCX 2.0 unit. My Whole plan is control “spybot” using RCX unit. To have a basic understanding of the communication, I used the sample posted my Mark Riley 19 Aug 2002. In RCX I used (...) (19 years ago, 28-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics.spybotics)
| | | | | Re: Arrays and proximity
|
| (...) The Spybot has a limited number of global (32) variables. NQC lets you access these via an array syntax. MindScript and NQC also let you use pointers to variables which effectively is an array. The maximum size of an array is less than 32. The (...) (19 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics.spybotics, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Arrays and proximity
|
| (...) If I MUST program a state machine, I could program it to be a small array. Something like this: if(i==0) r=array0; if(i==1) r=array1; if(i==2) r=array2; etc... Self modifying code would be more elegant, but can that be done? If it can be done, (...) (19 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics.spybotics)
| | | | | Re: Arrays and proximity
|
| (...) You CAN program it, or use the state machine structure provided by LEGO (...) You also can use NQC, but I don't know the extent of what's available on the Spybot. There are differences between the RCX and the Spybot. (...) Yes, perfect. But it (...) (19 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics.spybotics)
|
|
