Subject:
|
Re: FLL not allowing NQC; Mindscript is allowed
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab
|
Date:
|
Thu, 10 Mar 2005 13:34:24 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
11134 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.robotics, Thomas Johnson wrote:
| |
Actually yes. And it is not equivalent to your programs. snip
The CEEO example you cite is much more complex. It loops, playing 1 tone
while the touch sensor is released, and a 2nd tone while the touch sensor is
pressed. Once the 2nd tone has played 6 times, a final third tone plays.
Note that it has nothing to do w/the number of times the sensor is clicked.
|
The page from which the original image
came(http://www.ceeo.tufts.edu/graphics/robolab/container01.htm) says this:
“In this program, the RCX will continue beeping until the button is pressed six
times. The container keeps track of each time the button is pressed.”
Having no way to tell simply by examining the iconic representation of the
program I had to assume the description was accurate. Apparently it was not.
Do the folks at CEEO not know how to describe the functionality of their own
sample code? :-)
My programs were actually more complex than the CEEO example since they
demonstrate the use of multitasking and event handling which are more
technically advanced features of the RCX firmware.
John Hansen
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: FLL not allowing NQC; Mindscript is allowed
|
| (...) Complete agreement. But it is unfortunately not the case. (...) Actually, they would only need to move the curser over any symbols they were unfamiliar with. The contextual help will spell it out for them. (...) Actually yes. And it is not (...) (20 years ago, 10-Mar-05, to lugnet.robotics, FTX)
|
114 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
