 | | Bug in HEX handling? —Steven J. Morris
|
| | | HEX is not working the way I think it should in 1.1.1. Is this wrong or do I not understand something. This is 1.1.1 pbmax.srec. ok DECIMAL ok 65536 DUP . -1 ok HEX . -1 Why isn't this ffff? ok 300b 300b ? undefined word Isn't 300b a legal hex (...) (25 years ago, 23-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| | | |
| | | | | RE: Bug in HEX handling? —Ralph Hempel
|
| | | | (...) If you use U. (unsigned dot) you will get FFFF. The "." is for signed numbers. (...) Yes it is, but pbForth is case sensitive. Cheers, Ralph Hempel - P.Eng ---...--- Check out pbFORTH for LEGO Mindstorms at: (URL) ---...--- Reply to: rhempel (...) (25 years ago, 23-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Bug in HEX handling? —Steven J. Morris
|
| | | | (...) Thanks. That helps. Case sensitivity is good but requiring upper case for hex is annoying. I suppose this is forth standard. That is one thing that I find annoying about forth, that most builtin words are upper case. It reveals the age of (...) (25 years ago, 23-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| | | | |
